Working at Height Risk Assessments: The 2026 Compliance Path

Falls from height remain the largest cause of South African construction fatalities. The SANS 10085 require explicit risk assessment for all work at height — including step ladders. Compliance isn't optional, but the framework is workable.

The hierarchy of control

1. Avoid working at height where possible
2. Prevent falls (working platforms, scaffolds)
3. Mitigate falls (nets, airbags, harness)

Move down the hierarchy only when each option above is genuinely impractical.

Risk assessment requirements

• Identify all work at height
• Assess risk (height, duration, surface, conditions)
• Identify control measures
• Train and brief workers
• Inspect equipment
• Plan rescue

Common access methods

MEWP (Mobile Elevating Work Platform)

Cherry pickers, scissor lifts. SAQA training required for operators. Preferred for short-duration high-up work.

Scaffold

Independent or tied scaffold. SAISC Code of Practice compliant design. Erected and dismantled by SAISC trained operatives only.

Mobile tower

SAQA training required. Strict limits on height and stabilisers.

Ladders and step ladders

Permitted for short-duration, low-risk work. Not for continuous or two-handed work. Often misused.

Personal fall arrest (harness)

Lowest position in hierarchy. Requires anchor, training, inspection. Rescue plan essential.

Common breaches

• Using ladders where MEWP appropriate
• Untied scaffold
• Missing edge protection
• Inadequate ladder footing
• No fall arrest at roof edges
• No rescue plan with harness use

Penalties

Department of Employment and Labour prosecutions for height-related breaches are routine. Fines from R400k for SME breaches to R20m+ for serious or fatal cases.

MCFAR works with safety-conscious contractors and supports Construction Regulations compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions